Know what your AI
is really saying

Every AI response verified against your policies before it reaches your users. FR-OS returns a definitive pass or fail with a detailed report showing exactly what was flagged and how to fix it.

# Define your rules in plain English
$ fros policy create "block harmful content, limit escalation to 2"

# FR-OS checks the AI's response
$ fros evaluate --policy safety-01 --input response.txt

PASS  policy: safety-01
     result: all rules satisfied
     tokens checked: [user_query, response, context]

# When it catches a violation:
FAIL  policy: safety-01
     violation: "exploit" blocked by policy
     fix: remove "exploit" to pass

Today's AI safety tools
are just more AI

How it works today

Most AI guardrails use another AI model to judge the output. That second model has its own blind spots, its own failure modes, and returns vague confidence scores instead of clear answers. "The filter probably caught it" isn't good enough.

How FR-OS works

FR-OS checks AI output against your policies using mathematically proven logic. You get a clear yes/no verdict, plus a detailed report showing exactly what violated them and how to fix it.

Three steps. Zero ambiguity.

01

Write your rules

Define policies in plain English: "block harmful content", "limit sensitive topics to 3", "require safety disclaimers". FR-OS compiles them into checks that are mathematically guaranteed to work.

02

AI generates freely

Your AI model produces output without restriction. No prompt engineering workarounds, no quality trade-offs, no interference with what the model does best.

03

FR-OS judges

The engine, a deterministic and formally verified function with no learned parameters, evaluates the output against your rules and returns "pass" or "fail" with a report naming exactly what was flagged and what to fix. The judge is not a model. There is no embedding, no inference, no probability. Same input, same verdict, every time.

The judge is not an AI

The FR-OS engine runs directly on your output. No embedding model sits in the decision path, and no language model is asked to rate another language model. The verifier is a mathematically proven function with zero learned parameters. An optional ranker can help an LLM propose a fix, but the engine is the only thing that renders a verdict.

vs. AI-based moderation

Clear yes-or-no answers

Other tools return confidence percentages you have to interpret. FR-OS returns a definitive yes or no, with a detailed report you can audit and act on.

vs. Keyword blocklists

Smart rules that compose

Keyword lists are brittle and miss context. FR-OS policies understand categories and relationships: block one term and related terms are covered automatically.

vs. Prompt instructions

Enforcement the model can't override

System prompts are instructions the AI can ignore or be tricked into bypassing. FR-OS checks output after generation; it can't be jailbroken because verification happens once the model is done writing.

Mathematically proven

Same result, every time

FR-OS is built on mathematical proofs checked by machine. No matter how you run it, you get the same verdict. A proof each run.

Operator-led pilots running now

Get pilot access Email Daniel